Cirios Trends: Insight & Commentary on Bay Area Real Estate

Neighbors Can Kill Your AirBnB Dream

April 3rd, 2013

Think tenants leasing out their rentals on AirBNB are the only ones who risk losing their homes? Owners can get busted too.

I was out this week on the San Francisco broker tour and happened upon a charming Bernal Heights bungalow at 3704 Folsom St. Huge garden at the front of the lot leading to a quirky tree house like home replete with lofted beds, views and an in-law unit below. No parking and small, but for under $600,000 and a block North of Cortland, the house had a lot going for it.

And then I heard the story.

Apparently the owners had been using the lower unit as a vacation rental through AirBnB and one of their neighbors complained. The city came in, noticed there was a list of code violations a mile long and recorded a nasty report against the property. The owners don’t have the money to fix the problems, and it probably wouldn’t be worth it to anyway. More than likely, someone will come in, scrape the house and build a new one in its place.

It doesn’t take all that long in the San Francisco real estate market to become familiar with the term “NIMBY” or “Not in my back yard.” If you don’t  know what it means, just wait until you become a property owner … you’ll find out soon enough.

Mid-Century Modern: Mad Men Inspired Fad or Lasting Trend?

March 18th, 2013

It may be a stretch to attribute an architectural movement to a single television show, but Mad Men and the re-emergence of Mid-Century Modern as the design-du-jour may be just such a case.

Whether it’s our aspirational image of the stark lines and breathtaking views of Don Draper’s Manhattan penthouse or the funky furniture at consignment stores on Valencia that no one can actually afford, what hasn’t been cool in 50 years is once again exactly that.

draper.png

The movement harkens back to the middle of the 20th Century and often cites renowned architect Frank Lloyd Wright as its father. Wright was into harmonious design, both with humans and nature, favoring function over form. He is best known for works like Fallingwater, Graycliff and the Guggenheim Museum in New York. The essence of Wright’s vision was to meld the human lifestyle with nature, while removing purely aesthetic details. The style was embraced then mimicked by architects and real estate developers for decades.

In order to achieve the open designs and large windows so essential to the style, builders swapped out load-bearing interior walls for posts and beams – a novel structural concept at the time. Here in San Francisco, the variance is easily seen if you compare the classic Victorian layout heavy on walls and separate rooms with, for example, the sweeping great room and glassed in interior atrium of a suburban Eichler home.

victorian rooms

great room

atrium

The name Joseph Eichler is synonymous with Mid-Century real estate development here in California, evoking strong opinions from design aficionados and amateurs alike.

Eichler Homes built over 11,000 houses in the 1950s, ‘60s and ‘70s, primarily in western California. There are entire neighborhoods of these flat, wide homes in the San Francisco Bay Area, Los Angeles and Palm Springs, featuring Eichler’s distinctive A-frame roofs, floor-to-ceiling windows, clean lines and smooth transitions between inside and outside living.

The largest Eichler development in the country sits just 20 miles south of San Francisco in San Mateo’s Highlands neighborhood and Steve Jobs is said to have drawn design inspiration from growing up in a Mid-Century modern home (although not quite an Eichler).

Mid-Century Modern design has a tendency to create impassioned, borderline fanatical advocates of the style. Overpriced Classic furniture and art in San Francisco can be found on Mid-Centurymodernfinds.com and Mid-Centurymodernist.com is a blog dedicated to the best of the movement’s “architecture, furniture and design.”

On the flipside, developers of tract homes and low income housing projects latched onto simple design as an excuse for bland facades, flimsy walls and shoddy construction. Chances are, if you drive past a housing project or apartment building that makes your stomach churn, its aesthetic inspiration was rooted in some bastardized vision of simplicity claiming modernity. If you’ve been to Hong Kong, you’ll know what I mean – as the overriding goal of the builders of this kind of property is dollars, not design.

HK

These days, walking around San Francisco the variety in architectural styles can be jolting. A stroll down Diamond Street between 28th Street and Valley showcases not just a Mid-Modern home sitting next to a classic Victorian cottage, but a modern monstrosity mansion right across the street.

Given Mid-Century Modern’s penchant for open layouts, it’s no surprise that the movement is making a comeback. Well before Draper and his colleagues blessed midday whiskey drinking, the desire for congregating friends and family at home had already been reflected in modern architecture. Great rooms and abundant natural light are now a mainstay of new construction across the country.

And while it’s a convenient story that Mid-Century Modern’s popularity exploded thanks to Mad Men, a socionomic viewpoint flips the causality around. Socionomics is a school of thought teaching that social mood drives trends, not the other way around. Mad Men is popular because a refocus on social gatherings at home makes us covet Draper’s wide open apartment, while the increasing complexity of modern life generates a longing for simpler days when television was only just beginning to ruin our lives.

In other words, changing societal preferences drives design, not the other way around. And while the ornate trim and exquisite detail found in 100 year-old Victorians will always be coveted by certain San Franciscans, it’s notable that restored classics now feature then open layouts pioneered by Wright, Eichler and others.

Thanks to the Great Recession and “austerity” replacing “ostentatious,” the resurgence of Mid-Century modern appears to be more than just a fad. As younger generations rebel against the ownership society of the Baby Boomers and embrace utility over clutter, it stands to reason that design preferences will continue to shift towards simplicity.

50 years hence, we may find that the most sought after style in San Francisco is 100 years old – just like it is today.

State of the Markets — March 2013: Looking for the Next Subprime

March 5th, 2013

Ask most people what the biggest risk to the San Francisco real estate market is and the answer is likely to be the same: Another tech bust. Everyone — myself included — is on the lookout for signs that the market is getting frothy (again), whether their goal is to gain notoriety by calling the top or make better investment decisions.

And since we were reminded last month that the consensus is usually wrong, It’s a pretty safe bet then that the biggest risk to San Francisco real estate is not the technology industry, lofty valuations and another bubble brewing. Because while the fizzling of our latest boom would certainly hurt the real estate market, drive down prices and bring rents back to more rational levels, it’s impact would most likely be transitory.

What then, poses the largest risk to our humble market?

For one possible answer, let’s turn to a discussion I had last week with a fellow young entrepreneur and investor. He reminded me that after the dot com bubble burst, home prices slipped but soon recovered, partly thanks to the economic foundation building attributable to the Internet’s wild adolescence. Pets.com and WebVan went away, but the fiber did not.

Similarly, GroupOn may disappear, but the lessons marketers have learned in this great online coupon experiment will persist. Zynga may go fallow, but memories of virtual tractors will echo in the minds of video game makers for years to come.

So if the answer is not tech, what is it?

Think back to 2005. You know, the good old days when you could still get a mortgage on your credit score alone and home prices never went down. The entirety of the global financial system was predicated on the fact that past performance was a good predictor of future outcomes. To wit, structured finance — specifically mortgage securities — hinged on the fact that home prices would keep going up. After all, since there was no historic precedent for a meaningful decline in property values, why should models include the possibility as anything but a tail event?

To take the lesson one step further, and to dive deeper into the mechanics of mortgage security pricing models, the further assumption was that home prices were not geographically correlated. That is, local economic conditions in Seattle pushing property values down would not impact condo prices in Miami. The quants neglected to recognize however, that during the housing boom of 2003-2006 a non-geographic factor impacted home prices across the country: Loose underwriting guidelines.

We have come to call this phenomenon “Subprime,” and when it was removed from the equation in 2006, all markets not only suddenly became correlated, but they all went down. And kept going down.

And the models blew up. The impossible became possible. We know how the rest of the story goes.

So what is our “subprime”? What is that singular assumption we all “know,” that when proven false, will set the spool unraveling?

Tune in next month for the answer ….

San Francisco’s Historic Gems: Restore or Demolish?

February 26th, 2013

Only in San Francisco would a burned out flophouse with furniture stapled to the façade be considered an official historic resource. And only in San Francisco would a landlord be contemptible enough to let the building rot away to such a degree that the city had to force a sale through eminent domain … for $4,600,000.

Ah the storied history of Defenestration, once the Hugo Hotel, which anchors San Francisco’s skid row on 6th Street south of Market. And while the history of the owner’s fight with the city and the neighborhood makes for interesting reading (here, here and here), the building’s fate raises a larger issue: As the city’s aging historic buildings continue to fall apart, should the answer be restoration or demolition?

In this earthquake-prone corner of the world, this architectural debate is also a public safety concern. Many of those beautiful Victorians scattered about the city sit perilously atop crumbling brick foundations. And thanks to San Francisco’s rent control rules, most landlords look at structural upgrades as throwing good money after bad.

But in San Francisco this is not simply an aesthetic or safety issue, and the plight of the Hugo Hotel highlights why what to do with old buildings is such a complicated subject.

In 2011, the San Francisco Planning Department identified five new historic districts south of Market. The designation means that any building in these areas would require additional city scrutiny to be redeveloped, or otherwise materially altered. And inside the newly designated Sixth Street Lodginghouse Historic District sits 200 6th Street, better known as the Hugo Hotel.

It may seem odd for City Hall to work so hard to protect ground zero for blight in San Francisco, especially when it cuts a swath of ugliness through one of the most rapidly developing parts of the city. Enter the politics of affordable housing, in particular the decade-old saga of Single Room Occupancy hotels, better known as SROs. (for a more complete, albeit biased, history of SROs, click here)

SROs offer typically small rooms with shared bathrooms to those looking for short term accommodations. Tenancy ranges from days to months, and SROs have historically been occupied by immigrants, the elderly and the working poor. As San Francisco has grown up and gotten rich, countless SROs have been bulldozed in favor of higher density, higher quality housing desired by the high-paid workers who flock to our dynamic city. And as housing costs rose, the working (and indeed middle) class was pushed into the suburbs or across the Bay.

In the 1970s and ‘80s, a small but determined group of advocates fought back against real estate developers and their cronies in City Hall, pushing more populist-minded housing policies, instituting many of the rent control laws we have today. But despite these victories, the availability of protected, cheap housing fell dramatically.

Which brings us back to the Hugo Hotel, its vagrants, its pimps and its blight. San Francisco has a dramatic lack of affordable housing, and thanks to the housing market’s latest boom, the problem has become more acute.

Protecting historic resources isn’t just about making sure bay windows and ornate trim continue to line the city’s streets. Redeveloping old buildings, especially old buildings currently housing the city’s dwindling poor population, further constricts affordable housing units and drives up the cost of housing. And even though developers must designate a proscribed number of units in new buildings as “affordable,” the waiting list for such units is staggeringly long.

So even though it seems obvious that a vacant, fire damaged haven for depravity should be replaced, even doing so with a new public housing development has taken years to work its way through San Francisco’s bureaucratic process.

Throughout the city, building owners are forced to navigate a myriad of regulations, neighborhood politics, in addition to meeting the San Francisco Planning Department’s architectural guidelines if they want to make the old new again … even if it’s falling apart.

The flip side of course, is that these architectural marvels are part of San Francisco’s rich history and should rightfully be protected for purely aesthetic reasons. And thanks to architectural groupthink, real estate politics and developers’ bottom line, so much new construction (whether it’s new now or was new in the ‘70s) is so hideous that it’s easy to see why even those who couldn’t care less about affordable housing fight the demolition of historic buildings at every turn.

It’s a delicate balancing act to effectively preserve marvelous old homes as well as advance modern design and efficient building, all while trying to maintain what’s left of the city’s socioeconomic diversity. But in San Francisco, the task of housing the well compensated newcomers and the Tenderloin’s least fortunate is herculean, indeed.

2013 Housing Outlook: What if the Consensus is Wrong?

January 31st, 2013

“To me, consensus seems to be the process of abandoning all beliefs, principles, values and policies. So it is something in which no one believes and to which no one objects.”
– Margaret Thatcher

It’s hard to find a prognosticator not painting a cautiously optimistic outlook for housing in 2013.

This, in and of itself, should be cause for alarm: The consensus is usually wrong. Witness every January when so-called experts release their bold predictions which, inevitably, end up being just as off base as they were the year before.

Limited inventory, a slowly mending job market, waning foreclosures and low interest rates are all cited as reasons for a rosy outlook for housing. But geopolitical tensions, Washington gridlock and the specter of rising interest rates should temper our optimistic expectations. This groupthink is pervasive, nothing more than repetitive bullet points echoing the view that housing has bottomed, the worst is behind us and we are likely to see moderate appreciation in 2013.

And since pretty much everyone has bought into this view, it will probably turn out to be wrong.  So what should we be thinking about as 2013 kicks off?

Every January, well-known investor and market theorist Doug Kass puts out a surprise list for the coming year. As usual, it’s worth a read. What’s notable about his list aren’t the topics, per se (which range from predictions about bond yields to who will win the Super Bowl), but the rationale behind the exercise.

As Kass explains:

“It is important to note that my surprises are not intended to be predictions but rather events that have a reasonable chance of occurring despite being at odds with the consensus. I call these ‘possible improbable’ events.

The real purpose of this endeavor is a practical one — that is, to consider positioning a portion of my portfolio in accordance with outlier events, with the potential for large payoffs on small wagers/investments.”

The point isn’t to make predictions or make huge bets on low probability events, rather to assume the consensus is wrong and go from there. When you think against the grain, good things happen. And while being contrarian doesn’t guarantee you’ll get it right, it forces you think in a way most people aren’t. Greatness is rarely achieved by following the herd, and great investments are rarely made by being late to the party.

For this outlook piece, we are not just going to assume that the consensus is wrong, but we are going to go against the anti-consensus consensus. Double secret contrarian, if you will.

Those who don’t buy into the consensus view for housing in 2013 generally expect the housing market to take another nose-dive (The exception of course is Realtors, who still believe home prices never go down). It’s not that far-fetched: foreclosures and short sales are still ailing many markets, much of housing’s recent strength has been government-spurred, uncertainty looms over the fiscal cliff debt ceiling, Europe is still a mess, the Middle East could blow at any second and emerging market economies like China and India are struggling.

Indeed, there is much to worry about. But to borrow a line from Goldman Sachs CEO Lloyd Blankfein, “One of the biggest risks that people have to contemplate is that things go right.”

So without further ado, here are our top 10 reasons why housing is in for a banner year in 2013 and will (once again) prove the consensus wrong.

1) Foreclosures
 Drying Up

Throughout California, foreclosures were down sharply in the past 12 months. According to foreclosureradar.com, a data and tracking site, notices of sale (often the final legal step prior to actual repossession) in California were down more than 56% in 2012. The trend held across the Bay Area:

San Mateo County: -71.4%
Alameda County: -65.5%
Santa Clara County: -61.7%
Contra Costa County: -59.5%
San Francisco County: -55.2%

The trend is being mirrored across the country, with Florida a notable exception. As further evidence, housing news outlet Housing Wire recently changed the moniker of their annual real estate conference from “REO Expo” to the “Real Estate Expo,” to reflect the waning impact foreclosures are having on the market.

Fewer foreclosures in the mix helped sale price data look better than it probably was last year. Coupled with a more optimistic view of the market in general, prices are rising and more homeowners are climbing out from being underwater.

As long you don’t have to keep a fence around your pool to keep the gators out, this positive trend should continue in your local market.

2) Rising Rents Encourage Buying


Particularly in San Francisco, the rental market is painfully constrained and rents are through the roof. For many this means doubling up with friends, picking a cheaper neighborhood or abandoning the city altogether. For others, high rents make buying a more attractive financial option.

Of course, buyers still have to qualify for a mortgage and come up with down payment money, but with a brisk job market and a tech industry that is stubbornly proving naysayers wrong, for many buying truly does make more economic sense than renting. And as we discuss later in number 8, even those pesky mortgage lenders are doing their part to help out the housing market.

3) Demand Outweighs Supply … By A Lot

Analysts often cite limited inventory as one of the key factors pushing up home prices. But this is only half the story.

Back in early 2009 when the housing market was at its bleakest, inventory was at record lows, just like it is today. The problem of course, was that no one was buying. Now that buying demand is strong, any home that comes on the market with even a reasonable asking price is snatched up — probably with multiple offers.

Expect sellers to step into the market this year to take advantage of strong buying demand, but so long as household formation (more in number 4) and mobility (more in number 5) continue to improve, demand will outpace supply and prices will rise more than most people think.

4) Household Formation Back on Track

It was well-documented that during the so-called Great Recession household formation all but stopped. Kids moved back home, friends more aggressively shared apartments and couples put off starting families until their economic prospects improved. This put a massive crimp in traditional housing demand, since young people generate most new buying demand.

But about a year ago, this trend quietly reversed and has been gaining steadily over the past 12 months. People can react to changing economic conditions faster than builders can break ground on new homes, and many economists expect household formation-related demand to outstrip new additions to inventory for the foreseeable future (see below number 7 on the prospects for homebuilders).

5) Mobility is Back

As we have written in the past, rising uncertainty curbs risk appetites. And for most people, there isn’t a bigger risk than picking the family up and moving across the country. For some, even moving across town is a decision wrought with hand-wringing. So when home prices collapsed in 2008, the idea of moving became that much more daunting. Not to mention, when your house is underwater, moving is all but impossible.

As a result, mobility — the measurement of how frequently Americans move — dropped off a cliff. Historically, increased mobility has been tied to economic expansion, since the better people feel about their economic prospects, the more likely they are to risk moving for a new job or new opportunities.

In 2011 (the most recent census data), the highest number of Americans moved to a different county than before the Great Recession. Mobility has been notably absent from our nascent economic recovery, and since all signs indicate that this trend continued in 2012, the data point to a shift towards more optimistic economic sentiment. This bodes well for just about all aspects of the economy, particularly housing.

6) Homebuilders on the Rise


The stock market is a forward-looking pricing mechanism. Markets move based on expectations about future results, not what happened in the past. And if you listen to the markets, housing is looking up in 2013.

In the past 12 months, home building stocks have been on a tear:

PulteGroup: +159.6%
KB Home: +78.1%
Toll Brothers: +57.9%
DR Horton: +53.3%

In other words, investors are betting that homebuilders have a bright future. And homebuilders are putting their money where their mouth is. Single family housing starts are up 24% since last year, and while last year happened to be the lowest on record, remember we are looking ahead, not behind. In fact, December 2012’s seasonally adjusted new construction rate was the highest in the past 50 months.

7) Recessions Drive Innovation

As we frequently note, betting against innovation is usually a losing bet. And during recessions, a greater portion of us are pushed towards innovation as the only means of survival.

It’s no accident that the deluge of innovation and entrepreneurship of the past few years here in the Bay Area has happened against the backdrop of a dismal broader economic landscape. Humans, for all their faults, are resourceful and resilient. When finding a job isn’t easy, we still have to eat. And for as depressing as it can be to call the local coffee shop “your office,” new ideas spring from the necessity of earning a living.

Further, recessions wipe away bad actors and excesses. Witness the bloodletting of mortgage brokers and amateur real estate investors when the housing market collapsed. These people have not disappeared, but have been forced to reinvent themselves in more sustainable business lines that will help build a stronger foundation for future economic expansion.

Politicians abhor recessions not only because they don’t understand economics, but because unemployed people generally don’t vote for the incumbent. But despite their best efforts, politicians haven’t been able to fully jump-start the economy. For the sake of innovation and our long term economic prospects, we applaud their failure.

8) Lending is Loosening

Don’t look now, but banks are starting to compete for mortgages based on something other than rate. The mortgage market has been so boring, so vanilla and so restrictive for years now, that mortgages have become a financial commodity.

Big banks like Wells Fargo, Bank of America, Citigroup and JP Morgan dominate the market, pushing smaller players to the sidelines. Now, as the housing market continues to mend, smaller lenders are starting to innovate. We are starting to see 40-year amortizations, interest-only products and there are even rumblings of the return of stated income loans.

To be clear, subprime isn’t back and guidelines are still tight, but as the lending market begins to become an actual market again, qualified buyers currently locked out of the market will further the demand-supply imbalance we mentioned above in number 3.

9) Real Estate Tax Breaks Survived the Fiscal Cliff

As 2012 drew to a close and we watched the Fiscal Cliff debate drag on, the National Association of Realtors revved its lobbying machine into high gear. Specifically, it sought to preserve the mortgage interest deduction as Congress took aim at a host of generous tax breaks and loopholes.

As late as December 5th, 2012, eliminating or severely curtailing the tax deduction for mortgage interest was included in some Fiscal Cliff solutions being bandied about.

But once again, proving just how powerful the Realtor lobby is, the Fiscal Cliff “deal” did not change the mortgage interest deduction and was generally seen as favorable for housing. Buyers uncertain about whether they would be able to deduct their interest expenses were able to continue their search breathing a little easier.

10) Pessimism is Getting Old

It’s hard to imagine sometimes, but the financial crisis is about to turn six years old. That is just a long time to be pessimistic. We get it, there is plenty to worry about. But humans by nature are optimistic. We get tired of thinking everything sucks all the time. We look for silver linings, we shake off fear and push forward.

It’s not so much that we are forgetting the past, but moving forward. We have great problems to attend to, here at home and abroad. Nationally and locally. But our collective ability to solve problems has, thus far in the history of human evolution, proven far greater than the problems themselves.

Looking Ahead

At the risk of being called a shill for the Realtors, there is plenty to be optimistic about in 2013 when it comes to housing. And not just optimistic in the “well, the market probably won’t collapse again” sense, but there are plenty of broad, demographic trends that support the thesis that housing is in for another banner year in 2013.

There are of course plenty of looming risks out there which could manifest themselves and derail this rosy picture, but as we have said many times, if you are going to bet against housing at this point, you have to understand what you are betting on. And as we wrote this time last year, “the time to be bearish on housing was 2005, not 2012.”

And certainly not 2013.

2013 Outlook: Palo Alto Prices Set Record, Raise Red Flag

January 31st, 2013

By all accounts, property values at the peak of the housing boom were unsustainably high. But don’t tell that to the good folks in Palo Alto. Values, when measured by price per square foot, are actually higher now, at more than $1,000 per square foot, than they were back in 2007 when the market last peaked.

94301 - ppsqft60

Notably however, prices themselves have not yet breached the previous peak.

94301 - sale price

A rise in price per square foot but stagnant nominal prices tells us that buyers are opting for smaller homes, even though they are willing to pay more for each square foot of living area. This is consistent with shifting preferences away from massive McMansions and towards smaller, more efficient homes.

But this trend could also be cause for alarm. Below is the price per square foot trendline (black, left axis) plotted against a home size trendline (green, right axis). The average size of homes sold in Palo Alto declined sharply in 2012, even as values rose. Looking back to 2008, a steep drop in home size preceded a drop in prices.

94301 - sale price v home size

This makes sense. As buyers start to bump up against their prices limits, its easier to move down in home size than it is create money out of thin air. Even in Palo Alto, they haven’t quite mastered alchemy, just yet.

2013 Outlook: Is the SoMa Condo Market Booming or Teetering?

January 31st, 2013

Mark Twain is generally credited with coining the phrase, “lies, damned lies and statistics,” to capture the malleability of number crunching and how easily statistics can be manipulated to prove a certain point. Housing data isn’t immune, and even well-meaning analysis can be off-base.

Take a look at the first graph below, which shows SoMa condo prices as measured by price per square foot. The black line is a 60-period moving average, which shows the average price over the past 60 sales. At the end of last year, those 60 sales take us back to August 31st, 2012; so the end of the black line represents the average price for sales over the past four months. If your question is, ‘how have home prices fared over the past few months?’, then this graph would give you a sense of how to answer that question.

94103 - ppsqft60

But what if instead you wanted to know how prices did over the past two months? In other words, you wanted a really up-to-date snapshot of the SoMa condo market.

The chart below shows the same raw data overlaid with a 30-period moving average, showing the average sale price of the last 30 sales. This shorter period trendline takes us back only through October 31st, 2012. As can be seen, the answer is as different as the question (note the hiccup at the end).

94103 - ppsqft30

These shorter period trend lines allow us to capture more nuanced trends, but are also more susceptible to the seasonality inherent in home price data. Push the trend out for a longer period and you can see, below, what prices look like if you want the average price over the past year. Same general shape, but no indication like there is above that rising prices may be taking a pause.

94103 - ppsqft142

So what then, is the answer to the question: “Is the SoMa Condo Market Booming or Teetering?” Data would suggest that, while the broad trend has been up for the past 18 months or so, appreciation may be taking a breather. This makes sense, given that the world feels a bit more skeptical, particularly with respect to the viability of web-based businesses like Facebook, Pandora and Zynga.

The flip-side, however, is that so long as rents stay high, would-be renters may opt for buying as an alternative to paying $4,000 per month to rent a 1-bedroom apartment. This should buoy condo prices, at least in the near term.

2013 Outlook: Was the Facebook Effect Real?

January 31st, 2013

Earlier this year, real estate’s pontificating class was awash with predictions about the “Facebook Effect” on home prices. It doesn’t take a statistician to read the tea leaves below: Home prices took off in 2012. And it just so happens that Facebook also announced their IPO in the same year.

The graph below shows condo prices in the SoMa’s 94103 zip code, along with the timing of Facebook’s S-1 filing and its actual IPO.

94103 - sale price

There were, of course, more reasons than just the Facebook IPO for the rise in prices, but anyone in the market will tell you that Facebook had an impact. But how, since most Facebookers only recently got the green light to cash in their shares? The answer is one of the most under-appreciated aspects of housing market performance: Sentiment.

Facebook’s IPO didn’t impact property values in 2012 because employees turned stock options into houses. Instead, buyers believed the IPO would push prices higher and wanted to rush into the market before the event. They were willing to pay up to do it, as evidenced by bidding wars once again becoming commonplace.

Meanwhile, sellers held back waiting to enter the market until freshly minted Facebook millionaires had cashed in. Indeed, many are still waiting. This resulted in limited inventory and added to the frenzy, further extending gains in prices.

Now that most lockup periods are over, it remains to be seen just how much the actual wealth generated by the Facebook IPO will impact local markets.

2013 Outlook: Marina Condo Prices up 14% in 2012

January 31st, 2013

When talking about housing as it relates to the tech boom, we typically hear about soaring prices in SoMa and Noe Valley. Even Hayes Valley and NoPa get a mention, as both are up-and-coming neighborhoods hot with the tech crowd.

But the Marina? Despite your average programmer not really understanding the appeal of living in the Marina, it turns out people with money still like it there. Condo prices, thanks to a tight rental market and strong job market, were up 14% in 2012.

94123 - ppsqft60

Maserati sightings outside Balboa Cafe? Also up sharply.

 

 

2013 Outlook: While Palo Alto Brags, EPA Drags

January 31st, 2013

We did a double take when we saw this chart, thinking that two different zip codes had been superimposed on a single graph. But we were wrong: it’s just good old 94303, an area which encompasses East Palo Alto, or EPA, along with sections of Palo Alto proper.

94303 - sale price
Breaking down the data into each individual city, the graph represents a dramatic picture of who has benefited from the last decade’s housing boom in the Bay Area, and who has not. in 1999, home prices in Palo Alto were 2x what they were in EPA. Now, two tech bubbles and a housing cycle later, the gap has ballooned to 6x.

94303 - EPA vs PA

Comparing neighborhood pricing data is a great way to view housing and demographic trends in action. Want to know if more money is flowing to, say the Mission or the Marina? Normalize the data so they start at the same base level and away we go.

Interestingly, during the boom, EPA actually outperformed Palo Alto proper, with prices rising more than 50% from January 2004 to January 2006. The fall was just as spectacular, as prices tumbled 62.1% from July 2007 to July 2009.

94303 - EPA vs PA normalized

Another striking difference between the two cities is that even as EPA was in free fall during 2008, Palo Alto hadn’t yet peaked. After the stock market had started to crumble and the financial crisis began to pick up steam, home prices in Palo Alto defied all logic and kept rising.

Both markets have recovered in the past year, but for vastly different reasons. EPA’s market is benefiting from investors swooping in to buy foreclosures, fixing them up and either reselling or renting. Also, as prices rise elsewhere, EPA’s low prices and close proximity to jobs is making it increasingly appealing for wealthier buyers with a tolerance for grit.

Palo Alto on the other hand, is a direct beneficiary of the tech boom, as Silicon Valley once again flips on the millionaire printing press.